Posted By: jaeent ()
Posted On: 08/11/2007 08:13 pm
|
Name of Site/Business: Nails-Skin-Hair-Care.com
Site's Main Purpose: Ecommerce/Sales
Please Review the following:
Does the home page sufficiently convince people to go further into the site?
Does/can the site achieve its main purpose?
Appearance/Attractiveness
Search engine marketing. Can the pages be reasonably well indexed by search engines?
Additional Comments/Notes
My PR on Google nosedived about 4 months ago, just all of a sudden. Went from PR4 which I worked really hard for, to a PR2 and sometimes comes up as PR1. All 3 of my sites did this. Does anyone know, by looking at my sites, what the deal is? I need to fix it!
Thanks in Advance,
Julie
|
|
Posted By: OAC (Staff)
Posted On: 08/11/2007 08:34 pm
|
Hi julie,
You have put up 3 sites for review and have reviewed none of anybody eles's. May I suggest you review 6 or 9 other people's sites. In particular, it would help if you reviewed sites that haven't had a review or only one review.
Many thanks.
What goes around, comes around 
|
|
Posted By: jaeent ()
Posted On: 08/18/2007 03:17 pm
|
I would by happy to, but I consider myself a novice. If I can provide good feedback, I will. I'm not as technical as you all, but I will sure try.
Julie
|
|
Posted By: olerag ()
Posted On: 08/19/2007 05:55 pm
|
I took a look at your home page and several sub-pages (Nail Care/Hair Care).
1. The visible layout is great and my initial take on the site is, "Selling of Hair/Skin/Nail Care products with additional articles on the same". If this is the intent of your site then I believe your home page captures that.
2. Your sub-page forms (although they aren't really forms are they) don't function. For instance, I can enter a "ABC" in a product quantity and, after pressing "Add To Cart", validation doesn't capture the error. Suprising considering all of the interlaced JS in the pages and no less than 5 JS files referenced in the <head>.
3. Your pages don't contain a "doctype" so I can't verify/validate the html thru W3C.
4. For all of the JS image loading and redundant table and font declarations, I believe use of CSS would be ideal.
5. Very hard to read the source. I suspect your having some third-party software do the layout and its leaving tons of "white space".
6. As far as search optimization, sorry. That's why I visited the site to begin with and am waiting for same reply to my site. Maybe you can look at my site and help me with search optimization content?!?
|
|
Posted By: quartzy ()
Posted On: 08/20/2007 07:44 am
|
Hi
I had a look at your site and in my opinion it is too blue a more attractive site would be best for sales. There were a lot of products on sale in th side column but no info about the products. A products page would work well. I think. Also I got the impression that your site was a cheap design. ie most make money scams sites look like yours. But I am not an expert but do not take my comments too seriously.
|
|
|