Printer Friendly Version Print this thread
Email this thread to a friend eMail this thread to a friend
Featured Web Site Template

Hundreds More at Free Site Templates.com!

Web Site Partners
Sponsored Links
Jet City Software
 
Whos Here ?
There are 0 guests and 1 members in the forums right now.
Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
Moderator(s): g1smd, Logan
Member Message

loyal searcher
Joined: Oct 25, 2001
# Posts: 14

View the profile for loyal searcher Send loyal searcher a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-26 04:34
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

I just searched for "search engine optimisation" in Google and found two sites using dodgy techniques - hidden links and home-grown link farming - to get ranked at the top.

How do I notify Google about this? Has anyone contacted Google before about getting a site banned? What should one say to them regarding a situation like this?




GetARank
Joined: Oct 24, 2001
# Posts: 6

View the profile for GetARank Send GetARank a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-26 15:00
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Personally I feel SEO itself is manipulating rankings. The way of approach is only different. We all use these kind of techniques. Why should we feel jealous when some Website gets a rank?
It maybe impossible for us to get a rank without building LINKFARMS for these kind of
competetive keywords. That too the first site in that search result deserves that rank since it has links coming from world famous MONSTER.COM (AU and NZ) sites. I agree it is manipulated but dont you think that site deserves that 1st place since it has MONSTER and others as their clients.
As far as I'm concerned HIDDEN LINKS dont work well with GOOGLE for competetive keywords.
What would you do to get a rank for this keyword? Obviously you will create linkfarms like these, but the only thing is you dont have websites with good PAGERANK or maybe if you do have, you dont want to go for SEO related keywords since many can find out how you got these ranks.

Please correct me if I am wrong..





Lazerzubb
Joined: Jul 12, 2001
# Posts: 1977

View the profile for Lazerzubb Send Lazerzubb a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-26 15:34
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

It won't matter if you send a email they won't ban the site. They will relie on that Googlebot will find it.



Swiss Tony
Joined: Oct 02, 2001
# Posts: 67

View the profile for Swiss Tony Send Swiss Tony a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-26 17:16
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

And hidden links are a cardinal sin because...?

Hidden text and links are often the only way that sites can hope to get pages indexed.

For example, placing a hidden site map on the front page can be a very useful way of getting all the pages of a site indexed.

And what is the problem with hidden text, as long as it is relevant? How else can Flash siets ever hope of being found?

IMHO, as long as the text is totally relevant to the site, then I have no problems with them using hidden text/links.




crash
Staff
Joined: Dec 02, 2003
# Posts: 10626

View the profile for crash Send crash a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-26 22:58
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

If Google feels it is blatant enough - they will remove the pages - but it has got to be pretty bad, otherwise they rely on their filters to eventually weed thru the mess.



4dam W
Joined: Oct 11, 2001
# Posts: 727

View the profile for 4dam W Send 4dam W a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 01:14
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

I sent an email to search-quality@google.com and they replied almost immediately saying they will investigate.

No doubt it was because the sites are involved in 'search engine optimisation'



excell
Staff
Joined: Mar 19, 2001
# Posts: 14513

View the profile for excell Send excell a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 02:38
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Nice little sitemaps with doorway pages with meta refreshs in there. Not my idea of a great information rich themed web site... Oh well, google doesn't like tricks, so it will be interesting to see what happens on that one.



excell
Staff
Joined: Mar 19, 2001
# Posts: 14513

View the profile for excell Send excell a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 02:58
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

"We all use these kind of techniques. Why should we feel jealous when some Website gets a rank?"
Ummm,, NO we don't all use these techniques, there are some very successful SEO's that work within the rules and are successful with "ethical" means. A trick is just a trick.

I am not jealous of these companies rankings, I am sorry for them because they feel they have to do it to get ahead. Oh how easy to show a potential client this and point out the "rules" as specified by the search engine... What a joke.

"It maybe impossible for us to get a rank without building LINKFARMS for these kind of
competetive keywords."

There are better ways

What would you do to get a rank for this keyword?

On that particular keyphrase I wouldn't even try. The simple reason is too much work already comes in just by getting clients good top ten rankings using ethical means and if the results are there, word of mouth business brings in more than enough business. (But that is me just trying to keep a low profile .)

Please correct me if I am wrong..

I think you are wrong, it is a good idea to look carefully at what Google or any other searchengine might say on the subject of what they like and don't like.

You will see plenty of sites ranking well with "spamdexing" techiques but you gotta ask yourself "how long will that last before the engine algorithms tighten up and weed them out?"





MadScientist1
Joined: Oct 28, 1999
# Posts: 77

View the profile for MadScientist1 Send MadScientist1 a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 04:06
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

An interesting sidenote is that the GetARank person who made the post about everyone using these tricks is the same person who did the massive linkage spam campaign on Google a few months ago. Last time I checked all their sites had been removed from the index.



GetARank
Joined: Oct 24, 2001
# Posts: 6

View the profile for GetARank Send GetARank a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 05:03
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Not all my sites were banned. Its just 25% of them..
I agree I made lots of linkfarm but that's how I earned money. Only 2 of domains were banned the others were removed because the FREEHOST which I used removed my account so all my pages were gone.

I think GOOGLE banned my sites only because my sites got famous in ************** and it became a big issue. If it was not discussed I would have been in the index till now and forever. The rest of my "adult" related keywords was in the index for nearly 6 months and GOOGLE did'nt ban me (of course I was using the same techniques).





Crow187
Joined: Jun 12, 2001
# Posts: 117

View the profile for Crow187 Send Crow187 a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 18:29
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

First of all, there's a difference between someone getting all the top 10 positions by spamming and someone getting 1 or 2.

Sometimes i wonder why people have to rat others out... What's the problem with someone getting good ranking? I say good for them if they found a way to go around the system. It won't take long before the system gets them anyway. In a way, these people are vital to these engines as they help them to develop counter-measures, and make their engines better for the end user. The engines are big enough to take care of their own problems.

It feels like i'm back in elementary school and some kid in my class would go cry to the teacher... "Mrs Google! Billy's chewing gum! (and he won't share)"

Would you rat billy out if he shared with you?

You just can't cry and whine your way around. Instead, why not try to be better, find ways without abusing the engines and showing them that abuse will lead to nowhere? Why do people cry and report so much? Is it because you can't beat them at their own game? Try harder then. Alot of people live out of SEOing, and backstabbing someone with a family just doesn't do it for me. Even if they committed a hideous crime such as using hidden links.

Some people might consider it a flame, sorry about that, I get pretty pissy when i hear about people ratting others out.

To the people who ratted others out... was it really as satisfying as beating them while staying legit?
Gimme a break



OAC
Staff
Joined: Jan 25, 2001
# Posts: 6809

View the profile for OAC Send OAC a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 08:50
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

OK. Let's see if I have this straight.

Light fingered Phil has stolen my property and I can prove it. The police don't know who is responsible. Your advice is that I should keep quiet and work harder so that I earn more money so I can buy stuff faster than Phil can keep stealing it from me. This way I'll be better off.


Sure.



OAC
Staff
Joined: Jan 25, 2001
# Posts: 6809

View the profile for OAC Send OAC a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 09:40
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

PS. The only "Rat" here appears to be Phil. But I could be wrong.



jojo7
Joined: Sep 21, 2000
# Posts: 39

View the profile for jojo7 Send jojo7 a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 10:31
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

If half of the population had the IQ levels of Crow187,then the planet-earth would be a <b>much better place to make business</b>



hutcheson
Joined: May 12, 1999
# Posts: 1203

View the profile for hutcheson Send hutcheson a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-27 19:12
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

I'm strongly in favor of ratting. I'm not in competition with them, so there's no satisfaction in "spamming better." I'm strongly in favor of making it more dangerous to try to spam the search engines -- ratting accomplishes that. And I believe one post here by someone saying "I (or my prececessor) tried that, and was banned" scares more greedy crooks into ethical practice than all my precatory comments. So: please rat, with MY blessing.

IMO, the more that rude and unethical behavior is socially unacceptable, the better a place the world will be.

Turning to a different point, and with blood-boiling outrage (warning...these are my _very_ strong opinions, and I'm afraid that I may not be able to find a tactful way of expressing them.)
---------------------------- flame alert -----------

>>Hidden text and links are often the only way that sites can hope to get pages indexed.

This is without a doubt the single most obtusely ignorant and obscurantist statement I have seen in these forums in a long time.

The fact is, of course, that hiding text makes it no more attractive to a search engine.

The fact is, of course, that text-based links are MORE attractive to a search engine than links with no text (that is, hidden via a period or tiny/invisible graphic.)

The fact is, insofar as it is obvious that search engines can't always tell whether text is hidden, it is even more obvious that there can be no search engine boost to hidden (as opposed to visible) text.

Now, anyone could be ignorant of simple facts. But it is hard (well, so far, impossible for me at least) to conceive of any way in which a statement so totally wrong and misguided could have been made through mere incompetance and ignorance -- powerful as that combination is. (Of course, I've been surprised by the level of, um, detachment from reality that can be achieved through creativity and effort, so I may be wrong, and if so I owe an apology.)

Perhaps I shouldn't have to say this at all, but we do have new people reading these forums, and I'd hate to leave the impression that such statements as quoted above are generally accepted as true here.



loyal searcher
Joined: Oct 25, 2001
# Posts: 14

View the profile for loyal searcher Send loyal searcher a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-28 01:48
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

I am in the search engine optimisation business and our business employs absolutely no tricks which may put our sites or our clients' sites at risk of being banned. Which is why I hate the 'thieves' out there giving my industry a bad name using bad practices with no consideration beyond how much they can charge.

Thanks for your support! I'm going to rat away!



GetARank
Joined: Oct 24, 2001
# Posts: 6

View the profile for GetARank Send GetARank a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-28 07:55
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Why do you want to start your very first post about complaining other sites?

I still believe that sites deserves that rank since they have MONSTER (No. 1 Job site) as their client.

That proves their quality.



loyal searcher
Joined: Oct 25, 2001
# Posts: 14

View the profile for loyal searcher Send loyal searcher a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-28 08:21
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

That doesn't prove a thing.

You have a strange logic, GetARank.

Read this topic again.



excell
Staff
Joined: Mar 19, 2001
# Posts: 14513

View the profile for excell Send excell a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-28 08:35
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

Doesn't matter who the clients are, spam is spam pure and simple. This nonsense is what "most" leading SEO's in the field consider to be outdated, unethical techniques totaly out of compliance with the wishes of the search engines. And if anybody cares - *the searchers* (they are tired of the cheap tricks too).

Spam should be reported when seen, some of us would like to see a cleaner environment on the search engines.

Reputable SEOs are sick and tired of the bad name "some" are giving the industry.

None of our members should feel the slightest doubt when they uncover the nasty little cans of worms that are visible for all to see with little trouble and report it to the search engine concerned.

Webmasters working with and not against the search engines can do much.





kangamedia
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
# Posts: 27

View the profile for kangamedia Send kangamedia a private message

Posted: 2001-Oct-28 09:42
Edit Message Delete Message Reply to this message

i don't believe its spam. They are one of the leaders in SEO in australia. Look at some of there clients. If they were number one for "sex" then that would be spam or if they had the top 10 rankings all to themselves then that would be spam. What is "ethical" SEO there is nothing "ethical" about manipulating your site to get your site the number one rank for your keywords. I agree that there are lines which should not be crossed but this site is FAR from that. I really do think some people tend to over react when it comes spam. Don't get me wrong i don't agree with people who REALLY do spam but if you type in "search engine optimisation" guess what the number one site is a search engine optimisation company! And in my opinion it looks like a alot better than the majority of them out there.

Its normally the guys that are below the site that complain and try to define what is spam and what is search engine optimisation and just by chance the definition is exactly what they are doing. There is no clear cut rules which you have to or should follow. BUT there are lines which should not be crossed and this site is not crossing the line.


You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
  1. You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
  2. You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
  3. This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.

If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions contained within.

If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.

If you are still experiencing problem, please read the Login Assistance Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.

Switch to Advanced Editor and ... Create a New Topic or Reply to this Thread

New posts Forum is locked
© 1995  ·  iWeb, Inc  ·  DBA JimWorld Productions