Printer Friendly Version
Email this thread to a friend
|
Youtube Results on Google (In: Google)
How to make bad news go away ??????? (In: Members Lounge)
Sure Fire Search Engine Optimization (In: General Search Engine Optimization)
Search engine loophole? (In: General Search Engine Optimization)
all the results in 1 page (In: SEO Tools and Software Utilities)
Featured Web Site Template |
|
There are 0 guests and 1 members in the forums right now.
Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
|
|
| Member |
Message |
nowrocky
Joined: Aug 20, 2008
# Posts: 1
|
Posted: 2008-Aug-20 18:30
I believe that the solution to the perfect search engine is to base the search algorithm not on the quantity of links, because it’s easy to manipulate such a solution (i.e. Google bombs), but on a mixture of existing solutions and their enhancements (i.e. machine learning algorithms). I think Google’s solutions (other than PageRank) like the ability to handle phrases, synonyms, diacritics, spelling mistakes, recognise location etc are great and they could be implemented in the final solution. Companies like Yahoo (BOSS program), Hakia, Powerset and Cuil also implemented interesting data organisation ideas. Can they anyone create a better search engine than Google?
semantic web?
Another ingredient for the perfect solution should involve semantic web, but to what extent? Semantic web gives great results (i.e. Powerset, Hakia) and have a potential for further development, but in my opinion it is too much work for the effect. Is semantical search significantly better than text search?
maybe a new fresh solution?
The new solution should be based more on the quality than a quantity. But how to build a solution that would measure the importance of websites? I believe that we, the users should be able to personally rank each website we are interested in. The machines can help to sort the data according to our personal tastes. They could also find users with similar interests to ours to enhance search results.
Improvement of visual solution
Also we should be able to personalize the look of our search results, some people may prefer Google’s visual solution, others services like Powerset and Cuil. igoogle is so popular why can’t we then personalize the way search results are displayed?
{edited}
[ Message was edited by: Dinkar 08/20/2008 10:44 am ... Reason: edited as per TOS. ]
|
 |
ClickIt
Joined: Jul 31, 2000
# Posts: 742
|
Posted: 2008-Aug-21 02:05
How to make a more relevant and personal SERP? That's a deceptively complex question, which encapsulates many other difficult to answer questions.
Throw everything you've got at it, and the SERP will likely still not be absolutely 'correct', as the degree of correctness changes per user, per session depending on what the user is thinking at the time.
Is there room for improvement, yes. Working in this area should keep a lot of people employed for some time yet.
|
|
You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
- You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
- You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
- This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.
If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please
check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions
contained within.
If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.
|
If you are still experiencing problem, please read the
Login Assistance
Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.
|
Switch to Advanced Editor and ...
Create a New Topic
or Reply to this Thread
|
|
Inbox
