Printer Friendly Version
Email this thread to a friend
|
Featured Web Site Template |
|
Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
|
|
| Member |
Message |
rominosj
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
# Posts: 17
|
Posted: 2004-May-07 17:38
Hello,
I am using a cloaker that allows me to create templates and static pages. The static pages I can create with HTML and my own copy.
I have read here that I should not use the tag "<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="NOARCHIVE">" because it will be suspicious for the engines.
So, my questions is what script or iframe should I use?
to redirect where?
and where should I place it?
Also, will this script prevent my cloaked page to be cached?
Thanks,
Romino
|
 |
bhartzer
Staff
Joined: Jun 08, 2000
# Posts: 7042
|
Posted: 2004-May-10 20:43
There's no problem with using the noarchive tag, I would go ahead and use it.
There are actually more reasons to use it if you're not cloaking than if you are, including copyright and other legal issues.
Just because you're using the tag doesn't mean that you're cloaking.
|
|
iim
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
# Posts: 4
|
Posted: 2004-Jun-03 20:33
Which Program are you using for cloaking?
I am looking for 1..
Thank you,
|
|
bhartzer
Staff
Joined: Jun 08, 2000
# Posts: 7042
|
Posted: 2004-Jun-03 20:51
I suggest you start your search here:
http://dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Web_Design_and_Development/Promotion/Cloaking/
A word of caution, though, as you can get banned for cloaking and if you do it you really need to be very confident in what you're doing.
|
|
cianuro
Joined: Jan 22, 2004
# Posts: 164
|
Posted: 2004-Jun-03 21:02
I cannot believe people are still using these techniques. Whats wrong with good old fashioned SEO?
|
|
rominosj
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
# Posts: 17
|
Posted: 2004-Jun-03 21:08
iim I am using Search Engine Claoker http://www.searchenginecloaker.com/
Cianuro, don't use it, it will do you no good. 
|
|
cianuro
Joined: Jan 22, 2004
# Posts: 164
|
Posted: 2004-Jun-04 01:21
:o)
Thanks for the advice. I hadn't intended to as the TOS of every search engine I have ever used forbid them.
Just curious, anyone ever been cought using a cloaker?
|
|
rominosj
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
# Posts: 17
|
Posted: 2004-Jun-04 02:49
Well I have not been caught yet in one whole year, but I don't know if it is skills or luck, but I do know that people who use cloaking to feed irrelevant info to the engines get banned in no time. I don't use cloaking to send medicine information and porn to user, I use to conceal my optimization techniques, and so far so good.
|
|
johnathan2562
Joined: Jul 05, 2004
# Posts: 14
|
Posted: 2004-Jul-05 12:48
I personally would not condone Search Engine cloaking, but you know the risks so it is your own choice. Just for a warning a friend of my is trying to develop a tool that grab a page from google results / results cached and send the same request with a spoofed ip and agent header i.e. supposedly from Googlebot to the same page and compares the screenshots of both pages. maybe I should go into business with him and backsell it to Google ... if it works properly
|
|
You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
- You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
- You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
- This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.
If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please
check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions
contained within.
If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.
|
If you are still experiencing problem, please read the
Login Assistance
Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.
|
Switch to Advanced Editor and ...
Create a New Topic
or Reply to this Thread
|
|
Inbox
