| More Virtual Promote ... Search Engine Forums · Webmasters Toolkit · Free Website Templates · Scumware.com |
 |
| . | ||||
| Virtual Promote Gazette | Home | Subscribe/Unsubscribe | Archives | |
| . | ||||
gazette
|
Topics in this issue
Johnny's Ramblings In the Crosshairs A Word from Our Sponsor Forum Watch Coders Corner Scumbag of the Week |
Issue # 202 (08-12-2003)
Changes Afoot !We're changing things again here at Jimworld, bringing in some new staffers, and blazing new trails in the forums. Thanks for sticking with us while the dust settles here ... in the end, your JimWorld will be a much better place. |
| In the Crosshairs |
|
I thought I'd let you know some of the things that we're working on over the next few weeks to give you an idea of what's coming both to JimWorld and to The Gazette.
In the forums, we'll be reworking the entire private messaging system to make it more user friendly and manageable. Right now, it "just works." I'm fixing to make it "work really good." We're also going to be adding a user/post rating system. In the coming weeks, we'll be talking more and more about "The Marketplace" at JimWorld. This will be the place where you can network with other JimWorld members, post jobs, and hire one another. Eventually, this will replace the "I Need Paid Help" forum, as it's more organized and geared towards letting everyone conduct business with one another more easily. The week of August 18 is the Search Engine Strategies Conference in San Jose, CA, hosted by Danny Sullivan from searchenginewatch.com and Internet.com. Many of the JimWorld staff will be there in attendance, notably, Jennifer Laycock, Elisabeth Osmeloski and Andy Beal participating in some of the panel discussions. Expect a full report both in the forums and in the next issue of The Gazette. We'll give you the low-down and the real tasty bits, so that those of you who cannot attend will know all of the important stuff -- who can't hold their liquor, who fell asleep on the lawn, which speaker had the worst breath -- and more importantly, who's moving and shaking for REAL in the search engine world. Stay tuned! |
Read the In the Crosshairs section from the Last Issue or in the Following Issue
JimWorld Member comments and feedback ...
Posted On: 04/19/2006 04:35
Posted By: alfie1848
Posted By: alfie1848
Thank you for your review, I will benefit from your suggestions. I have one
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
Posted On: 04/19/2006 04:43
Posted By: alfie1848
Posted By: alfie1848
Thank you for your review, I will benefit from your suggestions. I have one
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
Posted On: 04/19/2006 04:57
Posted By: alfie1848
Posted By: alfie1848
Thank you for your review, I will benefit from your suggestions. I have one
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
Posted On: 04/19/2006 04:10
Posted By: alfie1848
Posted By: alfie1848
Thank you for your review, I will benefit from your suggestions. I have one
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
question though. You said "In the source, you really need a meta description
for each page just as you do with any web site." How do I do this with blogger?
Posted On: 01/04/2008 08:04
Posted By: boltonuv
Posted By: boltonuv
This "Scumbag of the Week" article is irresponsible. I had not trouble at all in receiving the following response from SpamArrest:
"Hi James,
Thank you for your email.
James, what you see there is absolutely wrong and is done to misguide our users and our new customers from Spam Arrest. We have over 1.5 million customers with us including you. You have been with us for a very long time, James. You can check with any of your contacts whether they have received any junk emails from us. We never do such a thing and its completely against our ethics! We hate spam as much as you do and so, along with stopping it, we make sure that none of our customer's emails are noted as spam. We warn our customers from sending bulk emails about the fact that their contacts might misunderstand their bulk emails as spam and will turn against them and Spam Arrest. A company following only such healthy practices can never do such a thing like spamming. What we value the most is our customer's trust and we will make all efforts to retain that in the best way possible. We never admit your personal information to any third party under whatsoever circumstances. You will find a whole lot of misleading things like this in Internet, James. We have friends and foes like anyone else in this planet.
I hope you will understand us the best way possible, James. Please do let me know if you need any further clarifications regarding this.
Best Regards,
Peter
Technical Support Specialist
Spam Arrest"
In the 3 years that I have used SpamArrest, I personally have never received one complaint from anyone that has been 'spammed' from any theoretical 'spam list' that SpamArrest may have created. I think that their statement above makes it clear that they would not do this.
I behooves you to publish a retraction.
Jim Bolton
"Hi James,
Thank you for your email.
James, what you see there is absolutely wrong and is done to misguide our users and our new customers from Spam Arrest. We have over 1.5 million customers with us including you. You have been with us for a very long time, James. You can check with any of your contacts whether they have received any junk emails from us. We never do such a thing and its completely against our ethics! We hate spam as much as you do and so, along with stopping it, we make sure that none of our customer's emails are noted as spam. We warn our customers from sending bulk emails about the fact that their contacts might misunderstand their bulk emails as spam and will turn against them and Spam Arrest. A company following only such healthy practices can never do such a thing like spamming. What we value the most is our customer's trust and we will make all efforts to retain that in the best way possible. We never admit your personal information to any third party under whatsoever circumstances. You will find a whole lot of misleading things like this in Internet, James. We have friends and foes like anyone else in this planet.
I hope you will understand us the best way possible, James. Please do let me know if you need any further clarifications regarding this.
Best Regards,
Peter
Technical Support Specialist
Spam Arrest"
In the 3 years that I have used SpamArrest, I personally have never received one complaint from anyone that has been 'spammed' from any theoretical 'spam list' that SpamArrest may have created. I think that their statement above makes it clear that they would not do this.
I behooves you to publish a retraction.
Jim Bolton
Add your own comment ....
Sponsored Links
 |
|
Member Spotlight
The Truth About Google Revealed
Explosive new software will help you get top 10 rankings in Google & Yahoo. (sumantra) |
