The Gazette ... Issue: 212 (09-15-2004)
|
Johnny's Ramblings
|
What's the next big thing? It seems like it's been a while since something completely new and radical came along on the Internet Advertising / Marketing front. Have we explored all of the logical avenues? Is it time to come back full circle? Online companies, ourselves included, are constantly finding ways to drive up revenues. It's especially tough on sites such as Virtual Promote, where we don't have anything to "sell" from a retail perspective. Yes, we do have some premium offerings, but the lion's share of our revenues come from advertising. The past few years, we've seen advertising models and methods run the gamut -- from being almost hidden, to completely "in your face." What started as a simple 468x60 image has given way to gigantic 800 pixel wide, browser dominators. Have you been to a Web site where you get a full-screen "commercial" that you have to watch before actually getting into the Web site that you came to visit? Have you actually watched the commercial... or did you just leave? We've seen the annoying pop-up ads, the supposedly less annoying pop-under ads, windows that launch when you leave a Web site, all manner of link exchanges, 404 page advertising, and people who buy old domains and throw up generic search engines that seem to live forever in your browser. We've seen the new trend in plain text ads (Google Adsense) and all sorts of inline advertising, such as that offered by Vibrant Media's IntelliText. All of these ideas were formulated with one thing in mind... to drive traffic to the advertiser, generate a lot of money for the advertising agent, and send a trickle of that down the Webmaster who's actually showing the ads. The other commonality to all of these advertising types is that not one of them is friendly... either to the Web surfer or to the Webmaster. Surfers have to deal with the ads in real time. They have to look at them (or past them), move them, install software to suppress them, and read around them to simply get to the nuts and bolts of what they're on the Internet for in the first place. Webmasters are forced into a spot where they have to design their Web sites to look good, read well, and yet still be able to fit the ads in. I'm personally tired of designing Web sites around ads, aren't you?
So, what's the answer? How can we as Webmasters make a decent income without having to design around an image whose purpose is to take our visitor away from us, without annoying our visitors in the process? We work too hard to get visitors to our Web sites to simply encourage them to leave the minute they arrive.Personally, I believe the answer to this question is simple. And by simple, I don't mean that the solution itself is simple, but rather the idea of "simple." Simplification of the process, the expectations, and of the implementation.Maybe, good old-fashioned sponsorships, backroom deals, and bartering are the real answer. Maybe a header that says "Virtual Promote's Search Engine Forums... brought to you by XYZ, Inc.", with a link to a page about XYZ on our Web site that then leads off to XYZ's Web site. Maybe instead of an annoying banner ad, we work internally to promote "XYZ," letting our visitors know that they help us make the site possible, and that because we are business partners, and have respect for their product/service, we recommend that you visit them. Mutual interests are served, the visitor isn't uncomfortable, and we all live happily ever after.
Sure it's a pipe dream. But wouldn't it be nice to be able to make a decent living, design your Web site the way that you actually want to, and at the same time, not annoy and drive your visitors away or detract from your actual content? I think that if the thousands of programmers who spend their days trying to find new ways to inundate us with even more annoying ads were replaced by some old-school marketing guys who would make handshake deals over drinks, we'd all be better served. Technology and nifty- programming certainly has it's place, but maybe it's time to consider "simple and old school" as the way to venture forward... I think that the lesson we've all learned is that obtrusive and "in your face" advertising on The Internet does nothing to increase ROI. But what will ? Is passive, trust based advertising, rekindled from the 1950's a viable way to reach and hold onto an audience in the 2000's ?
|
|
In the Crosshairs
|
At long, long last, The Gazette is about to get a dose of high-octane regularity... and some much needed clarity. While this publication remains one of the best newsletters of its kind (in our humble opinion), of late, I've been so vastly overrun with distraction, that it's taken an unfair backseat to other business. As a result, I've not been able to get issues out fast enough, and with enough "meat" in them to please everyone's tastes. In the interest of maintaining the highest levels of journalistic integrity, as well as to meet our goals of bi-monthly issues, I've brought in some outside help, from the inside, to take over the reigns, and get this newsletter back on track, in terms of timing, focus, and energy.
Welcome back into the mix, Ron Carnell. (That's "Ron C" to all you forum dwellers...) Ron's been in the background the last few months tending to his own business, but we've been able to coax him back into a more full-time and public role here at Virtual Promote. Anyone who's had the pleasure of interacting with Ron in the forums knows full well the amount of detail and professionalism that he brings into each and every discussion. Ron is the consummate professional, and like myself, one of Jim Wilson's oldest friends. He brings quite a range of talents to the table, being both a skilled programmer, leader of an extremely successful community of his own, and the unofficial "Poet Laureate" of VirtualPromote. His writing style will both entertain and educate, and his attention to detail will ensure that The Gazette remain informative, educational, and most importantly, on time.
Ron's official title will be "Editor In Chief" of The Gazette. He will be responsible for the organization, publication, and most of the writing that goes into each issue. I will continue to "Ramble" in each issue, and from time to time will point out someone as the next "Scumbag," but the lion's share of The Gazette will now be coming from Ron's desk. We will be having guest writers as often as we can to elaborate on some elements, and perhaps a few regular contributors as well. The ultimate direction of The Gazette will be decided upon by Ron, and by you, our readers. You drive the style and content -- so don't be shy, and let us know what works, what doesn't, when we hit a nerve, and when we're right on target. Your feedback will help us (Ron) to keep The Gazette on top of the eZine heap.
Expect the first issue of the new Gazette out on Wed, Sept 28th, and then every 2 weeks thereafter.
|
|
A Word from Our Sponsor
|
So, you have decided to sell your business, now what?
Part 3 - Tips: Do's and Don'ts for the Seller
In the final installment of our 3-part series, let's now discuss some points of Do's and Don'ts about selling your business. I'm going to combine a couple of the key areas to be covered such as - the information "package", marketing the sale, using advisors, and dealing with buyers -- all the way through Due Diligence. (I'm saving the discussion of that point- forward, though, for the final part of this series.)
To make this section a bit more fun, I'm going to bullet point all of the items and provide a little detail behind each, though most are self explanatory. This should make for fast and furious reading; though this is the information age, if you're like me you're too often bombarded with "information" to read. I've tried, here, to provide the most complete list without boring side notes.
Ok, the Do's first:
- Do have as much information on your business, market and comps as you can possibly have (the more you don't have the more you leave it up to the buyer to fill in the blanks and trust me that never works in the seller's favor).
- Do plan on the sales process to take some time (3-6 months is pretty common but it can be much longer, of course).
- Do continue to run your business as though you were not selling it at all!! (I've mentioned this before but it needs to be said again and again).
- Do plan on giving a lot of private and intellectual information away (this is a double-edged sword of course - the less you give the less you can expect from the buyer but the more you give the more you expose yourself so how you do this takes experience and skill).
- Do protect yourself though with NDA's (Non Disclosure Agreements).
- Do ask any potential buyers if they are serious about the purchase and if they have the money to purchase should all move forward. Sounds simple enough but guess how often a seller will actually ask that question directly. It is your right to do so and is your prerogative to not discuss or share information with anyone you do not want to. Let no one tell you differently.
- Do research other similar businesses for sale/that have sold, if you can (this is not always easy, especially with Tech/Internet businesses).
- Do expect to sign a Letter of Intent, Non-Compete (NCC), Purchase & Sale (P&S), Bill of Sale and possibly a Promissory Note as well (more or less depending on the deal size, parties involved the States of each involved also).
- Do speak with an Attorney and a CPA before you sell/begin to sell so that you are prepared when you need to be (and most likely you will need them).
- Depending on the size of your business and the party buying your business the hours needed for each will vary greatly. I suggest doing what you can though so at the very least you are not beholden to someone else and remember this is your deal not theirs - too often attorneys and accountants forget that, from my experience.
- Do review and consider speaking with a business broker. Don't consider just any - review and research first then speak with a few and then determine to use one or not. You will probably get some good free advice regardless, which doesn't hurt.
- And finally, Do put a plan of attack together for the sale and close -- but also expect that plan to change (probably more than once) and be open to ideas.
Ok and now the Don'ts:
- Don't lead with sketchy or incomplete information - after that you'll play catch up the entire time and will most likely lose trust for good… and then lose that buyer (and they may have been the best match!).
- Don't assume you will sell your business fast, for all cash and for 'full price'. Plan on being flexible somewhere and also plan on a lot of negotiating.
- Don't believe your own hype. Telling a buyer this business "could be Millions" in revenue or how "much promise" there is, etc. is just that - promise. Most buyers today will not pay for promise (save the Google IPO!).
- Don't believe every piece of information you have/know is "gold" and can't be shared. I wish I had a dollar for every time I have been asked to sign a NDA before reviewing a business only to then see how it is no different than 100 other businesses out there.
- However, Don't share anything that truly is "gold" until you have a serious buyer that can buy, has signed an NDA, and is moving forward (such items might be: actual programming code, vendor names, etc.).
- Don't waste your time with buyers that waste yours. Period.
- Don't assume you can handle all facets of the sale (legal, accounting, etc.) by yourself. The money you spend on that could save/make you 10 times that much.
- Don't turn over the "keys" until you have all in writing and a deposit on hand (you could hold the domain or put some of the assets into escrow along with the buyers money is the safest bet for any truly unsure situations).
- Don't flood the market with your own rip-off businesses - sell one and only one in the same space.
- Don't complain about or even negotiate the Non-Compete (NCC) unless it is very vague. I recommend specific -- but longer -- versions, and being upfront about your willingness to do so. That will show a lot.
- And finally, Don't expect everything to go as planned, for the plan will change without a doubt!
I hope that you find most of these self explanatory, however, should you need further explanations on anything above or simply would like to review more specifically, my email is always on and I welcome any and all.
About the Author:
Ross Whittaker is a Managing Partner at eBizBrokers, Inc., a specialty e-business brokerage firm located in Waltham, MA.
For further inquiries or questions, please contact rossw@ebizbrokers.com.
Comments (1)
|
|
Forum Watch
|
The Forums will be undergoing a few changes over the next couple of weeks, which I'd like to highlight here.
First, we'll be doing a redesign. The new design will introduce a new logo, as well as be quite a bit "skinnier" than before. Rather than go full width, we're squashing it down to fit in an 800 pixel wide window. For those of you browsing in an 800x600 resolution, you'll not notice this, but the rest of you will find that the forums being less wide greatly enhances their readability. In addition to the new basic design, we will be giving you a lot more control over how the forums work and appear to you. Specifically, you'll be able to select your favorite color scheme, most comfortable text size, and will be able to decide how many posts/topics you want shown on each screen of the forums. There will be a few more nifty features added in as well to make the overall experience in the forums not only more fun, but ultimately, more useful. We will be phasing in these changes over the next 2 to 3 weeks. As new features are rolled out, I'll be making them known in the Members Lounge, and will summarize them in the next Gazette.
Now, from the "In case you missed it" department, here's a few of the best discussions currently going in the VP Forums .....
Curious about GeoTargeted search, and it's affect on where your website is hosted?
Which directories do you need to be listed in and is a DMOZ listing really that important?
Ended up in the Google sandbox? Working through a "penalty" ...
What do you consider to be proof that your SEO campaign has been successful?
What types of things should a new webmaster take the time to learn?
Read these interesting topics, and many more at the JimWorld/VirtualPromote Forums
Comments (14)
|
|
Coders Corner
|
One of the more frustrating things that I experience in designing Web sites is finding the balance between a design that's cool enough, easy enough to navigate, and yet still friendly enough for the search engines to spider correctly. One of the things that adds to the coolness factor is a fancy menu. There's lots of neat DHTML based menu systems out there, which are extremely cool, but because they're all JavaScript, they don't give the search engine spiders anything to follow. Images that highlight and change when you move your mouse over them are cool too, but they're images. This means that the search engines can follow the links, but the link itself isn't associated with any actual text, so it's random as to what the spiders do with those as far as weight or score. Further, the "mouseover" style of menu typically doesn't "stick" when you change pages... the menu looks the same no matter what you're looking at. In this article, I'd like to show you a way to build a cool menu system that "lights up" when you mouse over the menu items, that knows what page you're on (and keeps the proper menu item highlighted), and uses text instead of images to generate the links. This should serve all Webmasters quite well. It's cool, it's functional, and it's spider friendly.
To get started, take a look at the finished product, and then we can tear it apart. Browse to our Webmasters Toolkit page. Take note of the left-hand navigation menu. As you move your mouse over the items, they "light up." If you click one, when you arrive at the page, you'll notice that the menu item for that page stays lit. You'll also notice that all of the links in the menu are pure text, and they use normal "href" tags to do the linking. This meets all of our goals... now how did I do that ?
I use a combination of style sheets, JavaScript, and "div" tags to make it happen. Let's start with the basic style sheet, which defines three very important things: How I want the links to look normally ("off"), when I move my mouse over them ("over"), and when we're on their page and need to stay lit up ("on"). Essentially, the difference among them is the existence of a border and the background color.
.on {
cursor:pointer;
background:#e0e0e0;
border:1px ridge silver;
font-family:verdana,arial,helvetica;
font-size:8pt;
padding-left:5px;
}
.off {
cursor:pointer;
background:#ffffff;
border:1px solid #ffffff;
font-family:verdana,arial,helvetica;
font-size:8pt;
padding-left:5px;
}
.over {
cursor:pointer;
background:#e0e0e0;
border:1px ridge silver;
font-family:verdana,arial,helvetica;
font-size:8pt;
padding-left:5px;
}
Once I have the styles defined, I'll build the actual menu. Here are two menu items from the actual menu on the Tools site. For clarity, I've broken them down into multiple lines ...
<h3>Validators</h3>
<div id="tool_v_html"
onmouseover="mover(this)"
onmouseout="moff(this)"
onclick="toggle(this);
document.location.href='/tools/validate/'"
class="off"
>
<a class='amenu' href="/tools/validate/">HTML Validator</a>
</div>
<div id="tool_v_css"
onmouseover="mover(this)"
onmouseout="moff(this)"
onclick="toggle(this);
document.location.href='/tools/validate-css/'"
class="off"
>
<a class='amenu' href="/tools/validate-css/">CSS Validator</a>
</div>
As you can see, each of the links is a normal "href" link using text. This makes them friendly and available for the spiders to find, and to score. Also note that each of the links is enclosed within a "div" tag. The div tag has a name (id) that I can reference if I need to, and it tells the browser what to do based on my actions. When I "mouseover" the div, run the "mover()" function. When I come off the link, run the "moff()" function. When I click it, run the "toggle()" function and send me to the right URL. That's important, because people won't always click on the link (the words) -- they may click anywhere in the lit up box, so we need to account for that. All of the function calls send "this" as a parameter. The JavaScript functions use that to know that "this" means to do it's work on the "div" tag that we currently have our mouse within. The functions called above are shown below. I have commented them extensively so that you can see what it is that they're doing.
<script language="JavaScript">
// First, we need to initialize some variables so that
// the functions are able to operate on them later on.
var last_obj = '';
var set_obj = '';
var sobj = '';
/*
The "mover" function is called when the mouse is moved
over a div tag. What we do is take a look at the div
tag, make sure that it's not one that needs to be ignored
and then CHANGE IT'S CLASS NAME to the one that matches
the "look" we want when the mouse moves over it.
The "moff" function works the same way, but is called when
the mouse leaves the div tag. The toggle function basically
does the same thing as the "moff" function, but saves the
name of div that we clicked on in case we need it later on.
Note that in all of these functions, "obj" is the variable
name assigned to the "div" tag that the mouse is currently
in.
*/
function mover(obj) {
if ( obj != last_obj && obj != sobj ) {
obj.className="over";
}
}
function moff(obj) {
if ( obj != last_obj && obj != sobj ) {
obj.className="off";
}
}
function toggle(obj) {
if ( obj != last_obj && obj != sobj ) {
last_obj.className="off"
}
obj.className="on";
last_obj = obj;
}
// Other functions in here (like the one we'll introduce in the next paragraph ... //
</script>
At this point, we have two of our goals achieved. The links are done in text, not images. They light up and turn off when the mouse moves over and off of them, just like the image rollover menus that you've seen all over the place. So the "coolness" factor is there, along with the search engine friendly-ness that we need. Now, to complete the puzzle, we need to make the div tag that contains the link to the page that we're on to stay lit up, and basically ignore the mouse actions. This makes the menu "smart" and gives the user a better sense of "where am I" when looking at the page. This is where we'll make use of the names of the div tags. We'll use another JavaScript function to examine the page and make this happen. In order for this to work, you need to call this function at the very end of your HTML, right above the " | |